content top

FERC Conditionally Approves Risk-based Electric System Reliability Registration


d-cooper-creditOn March 19, 2015, The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) issued an order in Docket No. RR15-4 (the “Order”) addressing a proposal by the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (“NERC”) to implement a Risked-Based Registration (“RBR”) proposal. The goal of NERC’s RBR proposal is to achieve an effective application of industry resources by considering the potential impact an entity has on the reliability of the Bulk Electric System (BES) when determining that entity’s Compliance Registry and Reliability Standards obligations.  The Order was generally supportive of NERC’s RBR concept and accepted much of the RBR proposal.  However, FERC rejected some parts of the RBR proposal, expressing concern about potential harm to BES reliability.  The highlights of the Order are as follows:

FERC accepted NERC’s proposal to base BES reliability registration and compliance requirements on the potential impact an entity poses to BES reliability.

FERC accepted NERC’s proposal to create a NERC-led centralized Review Panel that will analyze requests to: 1) have entity either not be added to, or else removed from, NERC’s Compliance Registry; 2) add an entity to the Compliance Registry due to that entity’s potential impact on BES reliability when the entity would otherwise not be required to register; 3) settle disputes over application of Registry Criteria; and 4) develop recommendations on whether an entity should be responsible for only a subset of applicable Reliability Standards requirements.

FERC approved NERC’s proposal to increase the threshold for registration as a Distribution Provider from systems having a peak load of 25 MW to those with a peak load of 75 MW.  However, distribution systems that have Under-frequency Load Shed equipment must continue to meet certain reliability requirements regardless of peak load.

FERC accepted the removal of the Purchase-Selling Entity (PSE) and Interchange Authority (IA) functional classes from the Compliance Registry, agreeing those classes perform market or commercial activities that have no material impact on BES reliability.

FERC rejected, without prejudice, NERC’s proposal to remove the Load Serving Entity (LSE) functional category from the Compliance Registry. FERC’s expressed concern was removal of the LSE category could result in some load and load forecast information not being reported for system modeling and transmission planning. FERC recognized that load potentially not reported amounts to a fraction of a percent of overall system load.  However, FERC appeared unwilling to accept any loss of load information.  FERC directed NERC to resubmit this aspect of its proposal with additional support in order to satisfy FERC’s concerns.  NERC is expected to make its compliance filing addressing FERC’s concerns by mid-July.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us.



Legal Disclaimer

Please note that the materials contained within this web site have been prepared by Jennings, Strouss & Salmon, P.L.C. for informational purposes only so that readers may learn more about the firm, the services it provides the background of its attorneys, and recent developments in the law. These materials do not constitute, and should not be considered, legal advice, and you are urged to consult with an attorney on your own specific legal matters. Transmission of the information contained in the Jennings, Strouss & Salmon web site is not intended to create, and receipt by the reader does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Jennings, Strouss & Salmon or any of its individual attorneys. While we would certainly like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Please do not send us any information about a matter that may involve you until you receive written authorization to do so from one of our attorneys. Unless otherwise indicated in individual attorney biographies, attorneys resident in the firm's various offices are not certified by the Board of Legal Specialization or a similar body of any State. This site may contain hyperlinks to Web sites operated by parties' independent from Jennings, Strouss & Salmon. Such hyperlinks are provided for your reference only. Jennings, Strouss & Salmon does not control such Web sites, and is not responsible for their content. Jennings, Strouss & Salmon's inclusion of hyperlinks to such Web sites does not imply any endorsement of the material on such Web sites or any association with their content. Your access and use of such sites, including information, material, products, and services therein, shall be solely at your own risk. Further, because the privacy policy of this Site is applicable only when you are on this Site, once linked to another Web site, you should read that site's privacy policy before disclosing any personal information.